<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Dog Owners of the Granite State &#187; HB 1639</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nhdogs.org/tag/hb-1639/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nhdogs.org</link>
	<description>Protecting the rights of New Hampshire pet owners</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 15:20:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>2010 NH Legislation Summary Report</title>
		<link>http://nhdogs.org/2010/07/29/2010-nh-legislation-summary-report/</link>
		<comments>http://nhdogs.org/2010/07/29/2010-nh-legislation-summary-report/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 20:43:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HB 1624]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HB 1639]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HB1417]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nhdogs.org/?p=851</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[During the 2010 NH Legislative Session, DOGS earmarked some 20 bills that would impact ownership, breeding, training and working with dogs and other companion animals. The numerous members of DOGS that testified at public hearings and contacted legislators certainly had an impact in legislators making informed voting decisions.  Due to the tireless involvement of our [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://nhdogs.org/2010/07/29/2010-nh-legislation-summary-report/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>7/17/10 &#8211; Letter to the Sentinel</title>
		<link>http://nhdogs.org/2010/07/22/71710-letter-to-the-sentinel/</link>
		<comments>http://nhdogs.org/2010/07/22/71710-letter-to-the-sentinel/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 16:48:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HB 1624]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HB 1639]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[letter to the editor]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nhdogs.org/?p=842</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On July 10th, in response to an editorial on hoarding, the Keene Sentinel published a letter to the editor from a supporter of HB 1624 and HB 1639. Her argument was that, rather than put limits on the number of animals a person could own, the legislature needs to enact laws similar to HB 1624 [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://nhdogs.org/2010/07/22/71710-letter-to-the-sentinel/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>March 11, 2010 Legislative Update</title>
		<link>http://nhdogs.org/2010/03/12/march-11-2010-legislative-update/</link>
		<comments>http://nhdogs.org/2010/03/12/march-11-2010-legislative-update/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 14:36:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legislative Updates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HB 1624]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HB 1639]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hb 431]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HB1417]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HB1525]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HB1596]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SB365]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nhdogs.org/?p=722</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The DOGS Legislative Briefing Newsletter was suspended for few weeks while the legislature took a vacation break and the House cleared up a backlog of action on other bills. The diligent advocacy activities of DOGS members made a significant difference in the outcome of several bills. Every bill that DOGS opposed has been killed. The [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://nhdogs.org/2010/03/12/march-11-2010-legislative-update/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>House Calendar on HB 1639</title>
		<link>http://nhdogs.org/2010/03/05/house-calendar-on-hb-1639/</link>
		<comments>http://nhdogs.org/2010/03/05/house-calendar-on-hb-1639/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 15:55:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HB 1639]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nhdogs.org/?p=706</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[HB 1639 (Dog Tethering Requirements &#38; Unlawful Taking) will be voted on by the full House on March 10th. From the N.H. House Calendar – HB 1639-FN-L, relative to the tethering of dogs. INEXPEDIENT TO LEGISLATE. Rep. Larry G Gagne for Criminal Justice and Public Safety:  This bill would amend RSA 644:8, III to add, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://nhdogs.org/2010/03/05/house-calendar-on-hb-1639/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>February 12, 2010 Legislative Update</title>
		<link>http://nhdogs.org/2010/02/12/february-12-2010-legislative-update/</link>
		<comments>http://nhdogs.org/2010/02/12/february-12-2010-legislative-update/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 13:32:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legislative Updates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HB 1639]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HB1417]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HB1525]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HB1596]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HB1624]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SB365]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nhdogs.org/?p=675</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NH LEGISLATIVE ACTION HB 1639 (Dog Tethering Requirements &#38; Unlawful Taking) &#8211; House Criminal Justice Committee Votes. On February 11th, the House Criminal Justice Committee voted to recommend the bill Inexpedient to Legislative in a 13-2 vote. Rep. Larry Gagne from Manchester made the motion. Representatives McCarthy and Chandley voted against the motion to recommend [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://nhdogs.org/2010/02/12/february-12-2010-legislative-update/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>February 5, 2010 Legislative Update</title>
		<link>http://nhdogs.org/2010/02/05/february-5-2010-legislative-update/</link>
		<comments>http://nhdogs.org/2010/02/05/february-5-2010-legislative-update/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 00:39:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legislative Updates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HB 1624]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HB 1639]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HB1437]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legislative Update]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NH animal legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NH dog legislation hearings]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nhdogs.org/?p=590</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[HB 1639 (Dog Tethering Requirements &#38; Unlawful Taking) House Criminal Justice Committee Schedules Vote. The House Criminal Justice Committee has scheduled HB 1639 for a committee vote on February 9th or 11th.  This clearly indicates that there will not be a subcommittee convened to discuss the bill further.  HB1639 adds a new section to the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://nhdogs.org/2010/02/05/february-5-2010-legislative-update/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>January 23,2010 Legislative update</title>
		<link>http://nhdogs.org/2010/01/23/january-232010-legislative-update/</link>
		<comments>http://nhdogs.org/2010/01/23/january-232010-legislative-update/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 14:29:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legislative Updates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HB 1624]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HB 1639]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NH dog legislation hearings]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nhdogs.org/?p=511</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Update on HB 1624 (Dog Breeder Requirements) &#38; HB 1639 (Tethering and Animal Confiscation Criteria) This past week, two bills that would restrict the rights of dog breeders and animal owners had legislative public hearings. Many thanks to all who prepared and presented testimony and signed in opposed as well as those who sent letters.  [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://nhdogs.org/2010/01/23/january-232010-legislative-update/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More on HB1639 &#8211; tethering</title>
		<link>http://nhdogs.org/2010/01/14/more-on-hb1639-tethering/</link>
		<comments>http://nhdogs.org/2010/01/14/more-on-hb1639-tethering/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 15:36:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NH Animal Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HB 1639]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NH dog legislation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nhdogs.org/?p=484</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[HB 1639 -relative to the tethering of dogs amends RSA 644:8, IV-a(a), the animal cruelty statute, to allow an animal, suspected of being abused or neglected, to be taken into custody without a warrant even if there is no imminent danger to the animal&#8217;s health. Here is the proposed change: &#8220;any appropriate law enforcement officer, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://nhdogs.org/2010/01/14/more-on-hb1639-tethering/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
